Will Republicans attack thier own?
Will Republicans attack their own?
With Republicans also now saying that Bush’s NSA program “appears to violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the 1978 law that created a court to oversee such surveillance” and calling for the overhaul oft he FISA law that’s a very real question.
You have Graham in one corner.
"This is sort of a Marbury v. Madison moment between the executive and the legislative branch," Mr. Graham said in a reference to the 1803 Supreme Court decision in which the court granted itself the power to declare laws unconstitutional.
"I think there's two things going on," said Mr. Graham, a Judiciary Committee member. "There's an abandonment of you-broke-the-law rhetoric by the Democrats and a more questioning attitude about what the law should be by the Republicans. And that merges for a very healthy debate."
And Melman
Melman (with Cheney, Rove etc.) in the other saying Democrats who have condemned the Bush administration's controversial eavesdropping program may not be suited to safeguard Americans against terror attacks.
But Ken, does that mean that Republicans Linsey Graham, Brownback etc. are also not “suited to safeguard America. You say you are not attacking Democrats patriotism by this, but I wonder how Graham would feel about your accusation?
If Cheney and Rove are serious about attacking Republicans who don’t bow to Bush, we may soon have an answer to that question.
With Republicans also now saying that Bush’s NSA program “appears to violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the 1978 law that created a court to oversee such surveillance” and calling for the overhaul oft he FISA law that’s a very real question.
You have Graham in one corner.
"This is sort of a Marbury v. Madison moment between the executive and the legislative branch," Mr. Graham said in a reference to the 1803 Supreme Court decision in which the court granted itself the power to declare laws unconstitutional.
"I think there's two things going on," said Mr. Graham, a Judiciary Committee member. "There's an abandonment of you-broke-the-law rhetoric by the Democrats and a more questioning attitude about what the law should be by the Republicans. And that merges for a very healthy debate."
And Melman
Melman (with Cheney, Rove etc.) in the other saying Democrats who have condemned the Bush administration's controversial eavesdropping program may not be suited to safeguard Americans against terror attacks.
But Ken, does that mean that Republicans Linsey Graham, Brownback etc. are also not “suited to safeguard America. You say you are not attacking Democrats patriotism by this, but I wonder how Graham would feel about your accusation?
If Cheney and Rove are serious about attacking Republicans who don’t bow to Bush, we may soon have an answer to that question.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home